How to Avoid Duplicating Validation Logic in EF Core Configuration and Value Objects?

Are you tired of repeating yourself when it comes to validation logic in EF Core configuration and Value Objects? Do you find yourself copying and pasting the same validation rules across multiple classes, only to end up with a maintenance nightmare?

Fear not, dear developer! In this article, we’ll explore the best practices for avoiding duplicated validation logic in EF Core configuration and Value Objects. By the end of this journey, you’ll be equipped with the knowledge to write clean, maintainable, and efficient code that will make your fellow developers green with envy.

What is Duplicated Validation Logic?

Before we dive into the solutions, let’s take a step back and understand the problem. Duplicated validation logic occurs when you have multiple classes or entities that share similar validation rules, but you end up writing the same code multiple times. This can happen in EF Core configuration, where you define entity relationships and validation rules, as well as in Value Objects, which encapsulate a set of values that have a specific meaning in your domain.

Here’s an example of duplicated validation logic:

public class User
{
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
    public string Email { get; set; }
}

public class Customer
{
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
    public string Email { get; set; }
}

public class Order
{
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
    public string Email { get; set; }
}

In this example, we have three classes – User, Customer, and Order – that all share the same properties: FirstName, LastName, and Email. Each of these classes requires the same validation rules, such as ensuring that the FirstName and LastName are not null or empty, and that the Email is in a valid format.

Without a strategy to avoid duplicated validation logic, you might end up writing the same validation code multiple times, leading to:

• Maintenance hell: When you need to update a validation rule, you’ll have to do it in multiple places.
• Code duplication: You’ll end up with multiple copies of the same code, which can lead to inconsistencies and errors.

How to Avoid Duplicating Validation Logic in EF Core Configuration

EF Core provides several ways to avoid duplicated validation logic in entity configuration. Here are some best practices to follow:

1. Use Fluent API to Define Validation Rules

EF Core’s Fluent API allows you to define validation rules using lambda expressions. By defining these rules in a single place, you can avoid duplicating code across multiple entities.

public class MyContext : DbContext
{
    public DbSet<User> Users { get; set; }
    public DbSet<Customer> Customers { get; set; }
    public DbSet<Order> Orders { get; set; }

    protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.Entity<User>().Property(u => u.FirstName).IsRequired();
        modelBuilder.Entity<User>().Property(u => u.LastName).IsRequired();
        modelBuilder.Entity<User>().Property(u => u.Email).EmailAddress();

        modelBuilder.Entity<Customer>().Property(c => c.FirstName).IsRequired();
        modelBuilder.Entity<Customer>().Property(c => c.LastName).IsRequired();
        modelBuilder.Entity<Customer>().Property(c => c.Email).EmailAddress();

        modelBuilder.Entity<Order>().Property(o => o.FirstName).IsRequired();
        modelBuilder.Entity<Order>().Property(o => o.LastName).IsRequired();
        modelBuilder.Entity<Order>().Property(o => o.Email).EmailAddress();
    }
}

In this example, we define the same validation rules for FirstName, LastName, and Email across multiple entities using the Fluent API. This approach ensures that the validation rules are consistent across all entities.

2. Use a Base Class or Interface for Entity Validation

An alternative approach is to create a base class or interface that defines the common validation rules, and then have your entities inherit from it.

public interface IEntityWithContactInfo
{
    string FirstName { get; set; }
    string LastName { get; set; }
    string Email { get; set; }
}

public abstract class EntityWithContactInfo : IEntityWithContactInfo
{
    public string FirstName { get; set; }
    public string LastName { get; set; }
    public string Email { get; set; }

    public EntityWithContactInfo()
    {
        // Define common validation rules
        ValidationRules.FirstNameRule(FirstName);
        ValidationRules.LastNameRule(LastName);
        ValidationRules.EmailRule(Email);
    }
}

public class User : EntityWithContactInfo
{
    // Inherit validation rules from base class
}

public class Customer : EntityWithContactInfo
{
    // Inherit validation rules from base class
}

public class Order : EntityWithContactInfo
{
    // Inherit validation rules from base class
}

In this example, we define an interface IEntityWithContactInfo that specifies the common properties, and then create a base class EntityWithContactInfo that implements the interface and defines the common validation rules. Our entities then inherit from this base class, ensuring that they inherit the same validation rules.

How to Avoid Duplicating Validation Logic in Value Objects

Value Objects are immutable objects that contain a set of values that have a specific meaning in your domain. To avoid duplicating validation logic in Value Objects, follow these best practices:

1. Use Fluent Validation

Fluent Validation is a popular validation library for .NET that allows you to define validation rules using a fluent API. By defining validation rules in a single place, you can avoid duplicating code across multiple Value Objects.

public class ContactInfo : ValueObject
{
    public string FirstName { get; }
    public string LastName { get; }
    public string Email { get; }

    public ContactInfo(string firstName, string lastName, string email)
    {
        FirstName = firstName;
        LastName = lastName;
        Email = email;
    }

    public override bool IsValid()
    {
        return Validator.TryValidateObject(this, new ValidationContext(this), new List<ValidationResult>());
    }
}

public class ContactInfoValidator : AbstractValidator<ContactInfo>
{
    public ContactInfoValidator()
    {
        RuleFor(c => c.FirstName).NotEmpty();
        RuleFor(c => c.LastName).NotEmpty();
        RuleFor(c => c.Email).EmailAddress();
    }
}

In this example, we define a ContactInfo Value Object that contains the properties FirstName, LastName, and Email. We then define a validator class ContactInfoValidator that specifies the validation rules using Fluent Validation’s fluent API.

2. Use a Builder Pattern

An alternative approach is to use a Builder pattern to create Value Objects, which allows you to encapsulate the validation logic within the Builder class.

public class ContactInfoBuilder
{
    private string _firstName;
    private string _lastName;
    private string _email;

    public ContactInfoBuilder WithFirstName(string firstName)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(firstName))
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("First name cannot be null or empty", nameof(firstName));
        }
        _firstName = firstName;
        return this;
    }

    public ContactInfoBuilder WithLastName(string lastName)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(lastName))
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("Last name cannot be null or empty", nameof(lastName));
        }
        _lastName = lastName;
        return this;
    }

    public ContactInfoBuilder WithEmail(string email)
    {
        if (!email.IsValidEmail())
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("Email is not valid", nameof(email));
        }
        _email = email;
        return this;
    }

    public ContactInfo Build()
    {
        return new ContactInfo(_firstName, _lastName, _email);
    }
}

In this example, we define a ContactInfoBuilder class that encapsulates the validation logic for creating a ContactInfo Value Object. The Builder pattern allows us to ensure that the Value Object is created with valid data, and we can avoid duplicating validation logic across multiple Value Objects.

Conclusion

By following these best practices, you can avoid duplicating validation logic in EF Core configuration and Value Objects. Remember to use Fluent API to define validation rules, create a base class or interface for entity validation, use Fluent Validation for Value Objects, and consider using a Builder pattern to encaps

Frequently Asked Question

Get ready to master the art of avoiding duplicated validation logic in EF Core configuration and Value Objects!